Title: Womb

Also known as:
N/A

Year: 2010

Genre: Drama / Arthouse

Language: English

Runtime: 111 min

Director: Benedek Fliegauf

Writer: Benedek Fliegauf

IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1216520/

Plot:
After 12 years apart Rebecca and Thomas, two childhood friends, finally meet again and their relationship grows into a romance. One day Thomas is killed in a car accident and Rebecca is soon considering genetic replication - to bear the clone of her dead lover as a way to get him back to life.

Our thoughts:
I enjoy it when film does what "Womb" does. Films that make you question your own morality. Bringing up things that you most likely have an automatic answer for, but once you start thinking about it you can't stop scratching your head about it. Is this-and-that technically wrong? Morally wrong, probably. But is it by definition wrong? "Womb" does this in a very interesting matter, especially considering where research is going nowadays.

Rebecca and Thomas are best friends at the age of 10 when Rebecca's mother decides to move to Tokyo. This causes a sudden break in the friendship. 12 years later she comes back and they quickly pick it up where they left off. Quickly after reuniting, Thomas is hit by a car and dies on impact. Rebecca's devastation and guilt turns around when she realizes she can get him back through genetic replication. She discusses it with Thomas' parents before going through with it. In a world where "clones" are looked upon with disgust, Rebecca is now carrying a clone of her dead lover in the womb.

This is where the film gets interesting, albeit awkward. Does she want to give birth to her lover's clone because she wanted to bear his child and this is the only way now, or does she want to have him back as a lover/boyfriend? Is either of the two morally right? This brings up the very current question: is it okay to clone a person, and should we be allowed to play God? In this flick this is already a growing trend. But the big question of the movie, and the one that is focused on heavily, is: is it incest if she makes love to the clone, when she gave birth to it? The vibe that's going through the film from the moment you know she's carrying the clone in her womb is both awkward and provocative. You want the suspension of disbelief regarding her reasons for cloning him, but you pretty much know what she's after.

The film becomes even more thought-provoking once the clone is born and she's taking care of him as a child, only giving him strange looks from time to time. Some really awkward moments, indeed. But is the movie ever repulsive or disgusting, even though it deals with (artifical) incest? I wouldn't say so. It has moments that definitely are messed up and will get your head burning with thoughts and opinions. The movie is extremely low-key, though. So much is said through mere looks. The style and atmosphere is also rather calming, not to mention the fantastic location of their house near the ocean.

I think "Womb" is a really good movie simply because it does make you think. As I said before: you probably have an automatic answer if it's wrong when you go into the film. There's no way you won't question it before the film ends, though. No matter what you end up thinking by the end of it. And that's very interesting to me. I am horrified at the thought of this thing becoming reality, as it seems to be very close now. I refuse to look at the film as an opinion or propaganda on that matter, and more something people should think about before accepting all researching in science.

I recommend "Womb" as a very thought-provoking sci-fi(ish) drama. It's not the best movie of the year and it's far from fast paced (the almost 2 hour long time doesn't hurt it much at all, luckily). The idea of the story is also probably more interesting and fascinating than the actual film. The reason for that, I think, is because the film wants to carry as much realism as possible so it never goes crazy with the idea. It's definitely worth checking up on the film if you think it's a title for you.


Positive things:
- Great acting from both leads.
- The awkwardness.
- It will make you think.
- Loved the location. It was really relaxing!
- Open-ended and it fits.
- One of my favorite scenes was the meeting with the other clone.
Negative things:
- Could easily be mistaken for something it's not.
- I'm not entirely sure how political the reasons for making the film were.

Rating:
Gore: 0/5
Nudity: 0.5/5
Story: 4/5
Effects: 3.5/5
Comedy: 0/5

We bought this movie from:
N/A

Reviewed by:
Ronny




 

Like us on Facebook



"City of Rott: Streets of Rott" Press Release
Best of 2016
Best of 2015
Underrated Horror Movies That Aren't Underrated: A Halloween List
Howling: Halloween 2015
Amityville: Halloween 2015
A Stephen King Halloween for 2015
"Tales of the Dim" Press Release
Best of 2014
Full Moon Favorites
A '90s Halloween
Best of 2013
A Profane Preview
A Netflix Halloween for 2013
"German Angst" on Kickstarter
The Sexploitation/Erotica List
Ronny's Arthouse Films List #2
Best of 2012
Worst of 2012
Halloween list: Mockumentaries

Special Feature Archives



 
 
TOP 10 OF LAST YEAR:
1. Fires on the Plain
2. What We Do in the Shadows
3. We Are Still Here
4. Spring
5. Makeup Room
6. Kumiko, the Treasure Hunter
7. A Pigeon Sat on a Branch Reflecting on Existence
8. Shadow Zombie
9. Honeymoon
10. Nina Forever
Taken from Best of 2015



CURRENT FAVORITE
DISTRIBUTORS:
- Mondo Vision
BFI
- Second Run DVD